Methodology of Increasing and Developing Students' Interest in Teaching Chemistry With the Help of Ict. (on the Example of the Topic, "Types of Crystal Lattices")
Keywords:
diamond, graphite, silicon, boron, non-polar, simple substancesAbstract
In three articles, the load on chemistry of 8th grade school students was studied. The speed of students' access to information and communication technologies was determined. The emergence of images of atoms, external images, modern pedagogical technologies, which are difficult to create on the topic. Modern education increasingly integrates Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to enhance student engagement and understanding. In chemistry, abstract topics like crystal lattices (ionic, covalent, metallic, and molecular) can be difficult to visualize. ICT tools help transform these concepts into interactive and engaging learning experiences, thereby increasing students’ interest and motivation.
References
D. L. Nelson and M. M. Cox, Principles of Biochemistry, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: W.H. Freeman and Company, 2008, p. 377.
J. H. Golbeck, “Structure, function and organization of the Photosystem I reaction center complex,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 895, no. 3, pp. 201–215, 1987, doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(87)90147-8.
S. Fayzulloyeva, “Results aimed at improving the efficiency of information and communication technologies in the process of teaching chemistry,” Intelektualitas Jurnal Penelyan Lintas Keilmuan, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–7, 2025.
R. E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
R. C. Clark and R. E. Mayer, E-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2016.
A. H. Johnstone, “Teaching of chemistry – Logical or psychological?” Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2000.
J. K. Gilbert, Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2005.
H. K. Wu, J. S. Krajcik, and E. Soloway, “Promoting understanding of chemical representations through ICT,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 821–842, 2001.
R. Kozma and J. Russell, “Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence,” in Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2005.
M. J. Sanger and T. J. Greenbowe, “Addressing student misconceptions using computer simulations,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 819–822, 2000.
J. W. Moore, C. L. Stanitski, and P. C. Jurs, Chemistry: The Molecular Science. Boston, MA, USA: Cengage Learning, 2017.
P. Atkins and L. Jones, Chemical Principles: The Quest for Insight. New York, NY, USA: W.H. Freeman, 2012.
T. De Jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, “Physical and virtual laboratories in science education,” Science, vol. 340, no. 6130, pp. 305–308, 2013.
M. Prince, “Does active learning work?” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2004.
L. K. Smetana and R. L. Bell, “Computer simulations to support science instruction,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1337–1370, 2012.
PhET Interactive Simulations Project, University of Colorado Boulder. [Online]. Available: https://phet.colorado.edu
